ReviewOncology letters2025
Immune checkpoint biology in hepatocellular carcinoma (Review).
Review in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and challenges of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver cancer: from monotherapy to combination strategies.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis-immune microenvironment crosstalk: emerging mechanisms and immunotherapy.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2026Review
- Lenvatinib Combined with New FP Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Efficacy, Vascular Remodeling, and Implications for Immuno-Oncology-Systemic Combination Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Redefining Liver Transplantation Indications for Hepatic Malignancies in the Era of Precision Transplant Oncology: An Up-to-Date Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Oncofetal reprogramming in hepatocellular carcinoma: linking developmental programs to cancer vaccines and immunotherapy.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, frequently arising in the setting of chronic liver inflammation and cirrhosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for HCC, although response rates remain variable with only a subset of patients deriving durable benefit. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of immune checkpoint biology in HCC, examining their mechanisms of action and their roles within the tumor microenvironment. The present review discusses not only well-established checkpoints (programmed cell death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4) but also emerging inhibitory targets (lymphocyte-activation gene 3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain 3, T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domains, B and T lymphocyte attenuator, V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T-cell activation, B7 homolog 3, B7 homolog 4 and CD47) increasingly recognized in HCC immunology. The clinical implications of checkpoint expression patterns are explored, including their prognostic significance and potential as predictive biomarkers. Current therapeutic strategies are reviewed, from monotherapy approaches to combination regimens involving dual checkpoint blockade and anti-angiogenic agents. Despite recent advances, significant challenges persist, including primary and acquired resistance, the immunosuppressive liver microenvironment and safety concerns in patients with underlying liver dysfunction. Future directions focusing on novel checkpoint targets, innovative combination approaches, personalized cellular therapies and biomarker-driven treatment selection offer potential avenues to improve outcomes for patients with HCC in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.