ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Binocular adaptive optics visual simulator with convergence control.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced Image Quality Impairs Monocular Blur-Driven Accommodation in Keratoconus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Effect of spherical aberration on the vergence-accommodation conflict.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a new generation of binocular adaptive optics visual simulator (B-AOVS). As in earlier versions, the system optimizes hardware use by managing both eyes with a single intensity spatial light modulator for pupil control and a single phase modulator for aberration manipulation, both of them based on liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCoS) technology. A single Hartmann-Shack sensor measures refraction and aberrations in both eyes, and a single tunable lens extends the correction and measurement range. Only the stimulus generation module is duplicated, using two HD microdisplays to ensure adequate resolution and field of view. The main improvement in this prototype is the addition of a motorized twin-periscope system that adjusts the vergence angle of the stimuli, enabling more realistic visual testing at multiple distances. Among other applications, this feature paves the way for studies requiring accommodative changes that would be otherwise unfeasible due to the vergence-accommodation conflict. For this particular reason, studies with past generations of B-AOVS were typically carried out in presbyopes or cyclopleged subjects, on the assumption that avoiding the conflict by preventing accommodation would render convergence irrelevant. To specifically test this assumption, our first use of the prototype was to measure defocus curves in one presbyopic and four cyclopleged subjects for varying levels of induced spherical aberration, with and without convergence control. In this non-accommodative situation, convergence showed minimal influence, as defocus curves remained similar, and therefore the validity of previous studies with B-AOVS under fixed convergence conditions remains unchallenged. Beyond this case, the new vergence control system enables accurate 3D stimulus presentation for visual simulation and opens avenues to study the impact of aberrations on the vergence-accommodation conflict.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.