ArticlePeerJ2025
Exploring influences on radiation protection compliance: a directed acyclic graph-based cross-sectional study in a non-teaching hospital in western China.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational radiation exposure poses significant health risks to medical personnel. However, the causal pathways linking protective knowledge, attitudes, and behavior (KAB) remain underexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to apply directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to clarify the mechanistic relationships among these factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 335 radiation workers from a non-teaching level III general hospital in western China used validated scales to measure KAB. DAGs were constructed based on theoretical frameworks and previous evidence, complemented by correlation analyses, multivariate linear regression, and structural equation modeling. Results: Radiation protection knowledge exerted the strongest direct effect on protective behavior (β = 0.55 5, Conclusions: This study applied DAGs to clarify causal mechanisms in radiation protection, highlighting knowledge acquisition as a key driver of safe practices. Age-specific interventions and standardized training programs are recommended to address knowledge deficits and mitigate age-related behavioral decline. These findings provide a methodological foundation for optimizing occupational health strategies, with implications for policy design and future longitudinal validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.