ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
ByteTrack: a deep learning approach for bite count and bite rate detection using meal videos in children.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03341247 (Brain Mechanisms of Overeating in Children), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Brain Mechanisms of Overeating in Children
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Assessing eating behaviors such as eating rate can shed light on risk for overconsumption and obesity. Current approaches either use sensors that disrupt natural eating or rely on labor-intensive video coding, which limits scalability. Methods: We developed ByteTrack, a deep learning system for automated bite count and bite-rate detection from video-recorded child meals. The dataset comprised 1,440 minutes from 242 videos of 94 children (ages 7-9 years) consuming four meals, spaced one week apart, with identical foods served in varying amounts. ByteTrack operates in two stages: (1) face detection via a hybrid Faster R-CNN and YOLOv7 pipeline, and (2) bite classification using an EfficientNet convolutional neural network combined with a long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent network. The model was designed to handle blur, low light, camera shake, and occlusions (hands or utensils blocking the mouth). Performance was compared with manual observational coding. Results: On a test set of 51 videos, ByteTrack achieved an average precision of 79.4%, recall of 67.9%, and F1 score of 70.6%. Agreement with the gold-standard coding, assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient, averaged 0.66 (range 0.16-0.99), with lower reliability in videos with extensive movement or occlusions. Discussion: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a scalable, automated tool for bite detection in children's meals. While results were promising, performance decreased when faces were partially blocked or motion was high. Future work will focus on improving robustness across diverse populations and recording conditions. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03341247, identifier NCT03341247.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.