ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Interventions supporting people from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic groups in the United Kingdom with musculoskeletal disorders: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) significantly impact quality of life, particularly among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic communities in the UK, who face disproportionate burdens and barriers to care. Despite growing recognition of ethnic health disparities, there is limited understanding of interventions tailored to these populations. This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on interventions for MSDs among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic groups in the UK, identifying key approaches, gaps, and opportunities for culturally appropriate healthcare delivery. Method: A scoping review was conducted following the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework. Seven databases (PubMed Central, CINAHL, Scopus, Medline Full-text, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Cochrane) were systematically searched up to April 2025. Studies were included if they assessed MSD interventions among Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic individuals in the UK. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were considered. Data were synthesised narratively using thematic analysis supported by NVivo v.11 software. Findings: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Three primary themes emerged: (1) language and communication initiatives, such as multilingual resources and telephone helplines; (2) pharmacological and dietary interventions, particularly addressing vitamin D deficiency and rheumatoid arthritis management; and (3) peer-support and educational initiatives, including community-based and culturally tailored programmes. A significant underrepresentation of Black African and Black Caribbean populations was identified alongside a noticeable lack of participatory or qualitative research approaches. Conclusion: There is a critical need for ethnically inclusive, culturally tailored MSD interventions in the UK. Future research should prioritise holistic, community-based approaches and actively address structural inequalities to improve health outcomes and ensure equitable care across all ethnic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.