Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112583›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Revolutionizing Early Detection: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Pink Luminous Screening Versus Breast Self-Examination Among Nursing Students.

Fatma M Ibrahim, Gharam Sami, Shabnam Bano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatma M IbrahimRAK College of Nursing RAK Medical and Health Sciences University Ras Al Khaimah UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2762-3350
Gharam SamiRAK College of Nursing RAK Medical and Health Sciences University Ras Al Khaimah UAE.
Shabnam BanoRAK College of Nursing RAK Medical and Health Sciences University Ras Al Khaimah UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. This study compares the effectiveness of the Pink Luminous Breast LED-based Technology Device with traditional Breast Self-Examination (BSE) among nursing students. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted with 191 nursing students aged 20 years and above. Data was collected using socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge of breast screening, and feedback on screening methods. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 28.0, employing Chi-square tests and thematic analysis. Results: 63.4% (121/191) of participants preferred Pink Luminous over BSE. Significant associations were observed between preference for Pink Luminous and marital status (88.9% [16/18] vs. 60.7% [105/173], Conclusion: The Pink Luminous Device demonstrates promise as an effective tool for breast cancer screening among nursing students. Integrating advanced screening technologies into nursing education could enhance awareness and early detection of breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast self‐ examinationpink luminousscreening

Identifiers

PMID41112583
PMCPMC12531106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.