ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Association between 24-hour movement guidelines and working memory in early Chinese adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of meeting 24-hour movement guidelines in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the association between adherence to the 24-hour movement behavior guidelines and WM performance in early adolescents, particularly the cumulative and gender-specific effects. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 2,163 adolescents aged 11-14 years. Participants' adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines was assessed using validated questionnaires. WM performance was measured via a computerized N-back task, including 1-back and 2-back conditions, with reaction time recorded as the primary outcome indicator. Statistical analyses (including descriptive statistics and regression analysis) were performed to explore the relationship between guideline adherence and WM performance, and gender-stratified analysis was further conducted. Results: Only 2.9% of participants met none of the 24-hour movement guidelines, while 27.2% met all three guide-lines; significant gender differences in adherence were observed ( Conclusion: This study identifies a notable, dose-dependent association between adherence to multiple components of 24-hour movement behavior guidelines and better WM performance in early adolescence, with this pattern being particularly evident under high cognitive load conditions and girls showing greater sensitivity. The findings indicate that adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines, particularly the combined reduction of screen time and adequate sleep duration, is associated with better WM performance during early adolescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.