ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Evaluating the use of AI in the design of learning situations by university students of early childhood education.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Higher Education (HE) is an expanding reality, exerting an increasingly significant influence on teaching and learning processes. Its integration into the university environment is reshaping how instructors design and deliver their courses while providing students with new opportunities to personalize their learning experiences. Not only does AI enable task automation and resource optimization, but it also presents methodological, technological, and ethical challenges that warrant thorough investigation. In this context, we assessed the academic performance of two hundred and thirty eight students enrolled in an undergraduate degree program for early years education teachers, defining performance as their ability to design learning situations aimed at promoting mathematical thinking in young children. Our analysis distinguished between those who used AI to complete the task and those who relied on traditional teaching resources. To this end, we adopted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. In the quantitative phase, we employed a quasi-experimental post-test only design with experimental and control groups. In the qualitative phase, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the learning materials produced by the students in the experimental group with the support of AI. The findings indicate that the application of AI brought about significant changes in the teaching-learning process. The experimental group obtained better academic results than the control group. These results underscore, on one hand, the transformative potential of AI to improve pedagogical practices, and on the other, the need for research to examine its long-term effects on student learning, teacher engagement and ethical use, and the development of HE curricula that include AI as a teaching resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.