Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112531›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Learner emotions in AI-assisted English as a second/foreign language learning: a systematic review of empirical studies.

Songcun Zhang, Xing Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Songcun ZhangSchool of Foreign Languages, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Xing LiuCollege of Languages and Cultures, North Minzu University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of generative AI tools in language learning has attracted increasing academic attention. However, previous reviews rarely focus on learner emotions in AI-assisted English as a Second/Foreign Language (ESL/EFL) learning, a crucial aspect for second language (L2) development. The present study addresses this gap by examining 37 relevant empirical studies, including four pieces of grey literature, focusing on the characteristics of recent research on learner emotions in AI-assisted ESL/EFL learning, the emotional variables, and the influence of AI tools on students' emotions. Methods: The researchers conducted a database search in Scopus, Web of Science, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar for relevant articles, following the PRISMA statement. Finally, 37 journal articles were selected in this study. Results: A review of findings indicates that AI tools have been widely utilized in more than 10 non-English-speaking countries, encompassing various English language skills, which suggests that AI-assisted ESL/EFL learning has gained popularity in L2 learning. Both positive and negative emotions were researched, including enjoyment, anxiety, boredom, interest, and shyness, as well as the relevant emotion regulation. Additionally, AI-driven assessment is a rapidly growing research trend. AI-assisted ESL/EFL learning can trigger students' positive emotions and improve their English skills. Discussion: The results of this study provide a deeper understanding of the application of AI tools in ESL/EFL learning and their impact on the emotions of L2 learners in recent years. It will be useful for educators and researchers seeking to understand and evaluate AI-assisted ESL/EFL learning, as well as learners interested in using AI tools.

Indexed as

AI-assisted language learninganxietyboredomemotion regulationempirical studiesenjoymentlearner emotionssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41112531
PMCPMC12529940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.