ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Adaptions in eye-movement behavior during face-to-face communication in noise.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Hearing Difficulty Moments in Conversational Audio.Trends in hearingArticle
- Building a Multi-Sensor Lab for Interactive Communication Research: Challenges, Workarounds, and Lessons Learned.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In face-to-face conversations, gaze serves a dual role: it conveys non-verbal messages and facilitates the perception of visual cues that support speech comprehension and smooth turn-taking. Typically, listeners direct their gaze toward the current talker to signal interest in taking the next turn, while talkers monitor listeners for signs of engagement. However, how gaze behavior and its coordination with turn-taking adapt to challenging acoustic environments remains poorly understood. In this study, ten groups of three young, normal-hearing Danish participants engaged in six discussions on several topics, each lasting approximately 7 min. Participants' eye movements were recorded using Tobii Pro Glasses 3 wearable eye-tracking devices. Conversation difficulty was manipulated by introducing two levels of eight-talker background noise ('8-talker babble'). Each group participated in three conversations in noise and three in quiet. The analysis revealed that in noisy conditions, participants looked more frequently at their conversational partners and made more eye movements overall. Gaze behavior also became more tightly synchronized with turn-taking: participants showed reduced gaze avoidance at the beginning of their own turns, and both talkers and listeners increasingly oriented their gaze towards the next talker at the end of a turn. These findings indicate that background noise significantly shapes gaze behavior, suggesting an increased reliance on visual information to manage conversational dynamics and comprehend speech. This highlights the critical role of gaze in communication and its potential to inform the design of communication aids and strategies, especially for individuals with communication challenges in noisy environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.