Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112502›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2025

Forest school INterventions for Children's Health: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial to compare Forest School versus usual indoor classroom-based curriculum activity with KS2 children: the FINCH protocol.

Hannah A Armitt, Rachel M Bottomley-Wise, Jodi Pervin, Sarah Blower, Sara Booth-Card, Bernadka Dubicka, Michael Foers, Susan Griffin, Catherine Hewitt, Kalpita Baird and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Hannah A ArmittResearch and Development Team, Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Willerby, England, HU106ED, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5948-0593
Rachel M Bottomley-WiseTrials Unit, University of York, York, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-0100
Jodi PervinDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England, UK.
Sarah BlowerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England, UK.
Sara Booth-CardYorkshire Wildlife Trust, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6814-976X
Bernadka DubickaHull York Medical School, Hull, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8907-8589
Michael FoersHumber and North Yorkshire Health and Care Partnership, Hull, UK.
Susan GriffinCentre for Health Economics, University of York Centre for Health Economics, York, England, UK.
Catherine HewittTrials Unit, University of York, York, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-3536
Kalpita BairdTrials Unit, University of York, York, England, UK.
Ellen KingsleyCOMIC Team, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-4588
Angela KingstonSEND Collective Voices, Hull, UK.
Charlie PeckTrials Unit, University of York, York, England, UK.
John PrattResearch and Development Team, Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, Willerby, England, HU106ED, UK.
Cindy StephensonHumber Forest School, Beverley, UK.
Marnie PalmerKings Mill School, Driffield, UK.
Piran WhiteDepartment of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, England, UK.
Peter A CoventryDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0625-3829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Child and adolescent mental health is a public health priority, and prevention, early intervention, and treatment are identified as national strategic priorities. Children and young people (CYP) in the United Kingdom are experiencing poorer mental health outcomes than ever, and the demand for services is the highest on record. Understanding the effectiveness of school-based interventions for promoting and developing emotional well-being is a core research priority. A school-based intervention that is inclusive and has the potential for widespread delivery is 'Forest School'. Forest schools provide children with immersive experiences in nature that are non-classroom-based and have a core focus on child-led activities and exploration. Despite widespread implementation, evidence about optimal delivery methods for Forest Schools and their impact on mental health and emotional well-being is scarce. This study will generate new knowledge about the feasibility of running a definitive Forest School trial with Key Stage 2 (KS2) children aged between 7-11 inclusive of children with special educational needs and disabilities. Research Questions: Is Forest School an acceptable and feasible intervention to improve the mental health of KS2 children?Is it feasible to run a cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of Forest School for children in key stage 2 (aged 7-11)? Objectives: 1. Test feasibility of trial procedures for recruitment, randomisation, and data collection2. Conduct a mixed methods process evaluation to evaluate implementation and fidelity3. Collect feasibility data to support an economic evaluation in a full trial4. Refine the current logic model and optimise the intervention. Methods: In Work Package (WP) 1, we will conduct a feasibility cluster RCT of a Forest School intervention with 200 children in five schools across Hull, East Yorkshire, and North Yorkshire. We will test the acceptability and feasibility of intervention delivery, assess the feasibility of the trial processes, and establish key parameters for effectiveness. In WP2, we will evaluate the quality and fidelity of intervention delivery through process evaluation, including observations and qualitative interviews. WP3 focused on the preliminary collection of health economic data. WP4 uses focus groups to refine the logic model and optimize the content of the intervention. We seek to produce a manualised toolkit informed by interconnected work packages to inform further research and implementation. The trial was registered in ISRCTN (The United Kingdom's Trial Registry). Clinical Trials Registration Number ISRCTN87263624. Patient and Public Involvement: This proposal was developed with the active involvement of parents/guardians, children, and schools alongside key stakeholders from the local authority, education, and the community sector. Dissemination: We will develop accessible presentations, online workshops with interactive elements, and newsletters. Producing a set of easily read infographics and creative outputs (video/social media) alongside our children's Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) groups will be a key output. We anticipate that two publications in open-access peer-reviewed journals will share the quantitative and qualitative findings of the study.

Indexed as

Children and young peopleForest SchoolPublic HealthSchools

Identifiers

PMID41112502
PMCPMC12534782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.