ArticleJTCVS techniques2025
Single-center experience with all-biological valved conduit for the treatment of complex aortic root endocarditis.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Despite advancement in medical and surgical treatment, endocarditis involving the aortic root still represents a challenge for the cardiac surgeon due to the anatomic complexity and fundamental function of the aortic root itself. The purpose of this research is to assess outcomes from one center's experiences of implementing the BioIntegral conduit for patients who have undergone both aortic root and aortic valve replacement due to complex aortic root infective endocarditis. Methods: From February 2011 to December 2023, 46 patients underwent BioIntegral valved conduit implantation at our institution. The mean age of our population was 67.6 years (±9.3 years), and the primary surgical indication was severe active endocarditis involving the aortic root. The mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II was 25.6 (±15.8). We evaluated 30-day mortality, overall survival, and freedom from reoperation as end points of our analysis using Results: Six patients died during hospital stay (13.0%), and the reported 30-day mortality was 8.2% (4 patients). The Cox regression analysis performed to evaluate the impact of both risk factors and intraoperative attributes on the 30-day mortality rate showed that the variables related to increased 30-day mortality were European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II ( Conclusions: Despite the small sample size, our results indicate favorable long-term survivals and minimal need for reoperation with the BioIntegral conduit. This conduit demonstrated positive outcomes even in patients with complex surgical histories and severe aortic root and valve endocarditis. Although promising, these results warrant further investigation with larger patient groups to confirm their broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.