ArticleJTCVS techniques2025
Stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Thoracoscopic left atrial appendage closure with or without surgical ablation.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Totally thoracoscopic left atrial appendage closure (TT-LAAC) with or without the MAZE procedure is an LAA management technique that prevents cardioembolic events by closing the LAA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Additionally, it facilitates rhythm control with a concurrent a mini-maze procedure. Here we present TT-LAAC outcomes without the MAZE procedure (TT-LAAC) and with the maze procedure (TT-MAZE). Methods: LAAC and/or bilateral pulmonary vein isolation were performed under complete thoracoscopy, with ablation performed using a radiofrequency device. Patients undergoing both LAAC and ablation were classified as TT-MAZE, whereas those undergoing only closure were classified as TT-LAAC. Successful closure was defined as a stump <10 mm as assessed via intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Results: Between March 2018 and January 2025, 200 patients (155 males, 45 females; mean age, 70.4 ± 9.6 years) underwent TT-MAZE (n = 151) or TT-LAAC (n = 49). AF subtypes included paroxysmal in 62 patients, persistent in 105 patients, and permanent in 33 patients. Closure of the LAA was successful in all patients. No in-hospital mortality was observed. Anticoagulant therapy was discontinued in 96.5% of the patients (n = 193) of patients after 3 months. No postoperative strokes were observed during the mean follow-up of 3 years. In the TT-MAZE group, sinus rhythm was maintained in 72% of patients at 4 years postoperatively. Conclusions: TT-LAAC procedures effectively prevent cardioembolic stroke even after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, regardless of whether sinus rhythm was restored after surgery. These procedures remain a valuable treatment strategy for AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.