ReviewJournal of cancer prevention2025
Patterns of Oncological Clinical Trials in African Countries: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of cancer prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Africa has increasingly participated in clinical trials; however, there is limited literature on the trends of oncological clinical trial registration. This study aims to review the patterns of oncological clinical trials conducted in Africa between 2000 and 2024. Three major trial registries-Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR), ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG), and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN)-were utilized. Data were extracted and analyzed descriptively using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation). CTG recorded the highest number of registered trials (n = 458), followed by PACTR (n = 148) and ISRCTN (n = 69). Egypt, Algeria, and South Africa contributed the most to these registrations. The number of trials gradually increased after 2010, peaking between 2018 and 2019. Randomized study designs were the most common, representing at least 80% of trials in the CTG and PACTR registries. Breast and cervical cancers were the most frequently studied cancer types, although few trials had published results. The completeness of trial information varied by registry: CTG (47.8%), PACTR (33.1%), and ISRCTN (84.1%). Only the ISRCTN registry consistently reported data on registration timing, whereas phases II and III were the most commonly represented trial phases in the CTG and ISRCTN registries. In conclusion, although there has been a gradual increase in oncological clinical trial activity in Africa, published outcomes remain limited. This study highlights the need to improve trial registration practices and promote the timely publication of results across the continent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.