Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112423›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer prevention2025

Patterns of Oncological Clinical Trials in African Countries: A Scoping Review.

Kumban Walter Chuck, Tung Hoang, Jeongseon Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kumban Walter ChuckDepartment of Cancer AI and Digital Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2247-1674
Tung HoangDepartment of Cancer AI and Digital Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6653-3406
Jeongseon KimDepartment of Cancer AI and Digital Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-2686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Africa has increasingly participated in clinical trials; however, there is limited literature on the trends of oncological clinical trial registration. This study aims to review the patterns of oncological clinical trials conducted in Africa between 2000 and 2024. Three major trial registries-Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR), ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG), and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN)-were utilized. Data were extracted and analyzed descriptively using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation). CTG recorded the highest number of registered trials (n = 458), followed by PACTR (n = 148) and ISRCTN (n = 69). Egypt, Algeria, and South Africa contributed the most to these registrations. The number of trials gradually increased after 2010, peaking between 2018 and 2019. Randomized study designs were the most common, representing at least 80% of trials in the CTG and PACTR registries. Breast and cervical cancers were the most frequently studied cancer types, although few trials had published results. The completeness of trial information varied by registry: CTG (47.8%), PACTR (33.1%), and ISRCTN (84.1%). Only the ISRCTN registry consistently reported data on registration timing, whereas phases II and III were the most commonly represented trial phases in the CTG and ISRCTN registries. In conclusion, although there has been a gradual increase in oncological clinical trial activity in Africa, published outcomes remain limited. This study highlights the need to improve trial registration practices and promote the timely publication of results across the continent.

Indexed as

AfricaCancerClinical trial

Identifiers

PMID41112423
PMCPMC12527969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.