Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112415›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2025

Development and validation of a comprehensive machine learning framework for a diagnostic model of uremia based on genes involved in major depressive disorder.

Kaiyao Jiang, Chi Zhang, Cheng Shen, Xingxing Fang, Huaxing Huang, Bing Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaiyao JiangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Chi ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Cheng ShenDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xingxing FangDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Huaxing HuangDepartment of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Bing ZhengDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and uremia are two chronic wasting diseases that have interactive effects and significantly aggravate patients' distress. However, the molecular basis linking these diseases remains poorly investigated. Methods: Various machine learning algorithms were used to analyze transcriptome data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, including those from MDD and uremia patients, to develop and validate our model. After removing batch effects, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between each disease group and the control group. Functional enrichment analysis was then performed at the intersection of DEGs from the two diseases. In addition, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) quantitative immune infiltration analysis was conducted. The optimal diagnostic model of uremia was constructed by analyzing and verifying the training set with multiple combinations of 12 machine learning algorithms. Finally, potential drugs for uremia were identified using the "Enrichr" platform. Results: According to enrichment analysis, a total of seven key genes closely related to MDD and uremia, mainly involved in the immune process, were identified. Immune infiltration analysis showed that MDD and uremia had different profiles of immune cell infiltration compared to healthy controls. Powerful diagnostic markers of seven genes (IL7R, CD3D, RETN, RAB13, TNNT1, HP, and S100A12) were constructed from these genes, and all showed better performance than published uremia diagnostic models. In addition, decitabine and nine other agents were found to be potential agents for the treatment of uremia. Conclusion: Our study combined bioinformatics techniques and machine learning methods to develop a diagnostic model for uremia, focusing on common genes between MDD and uremia.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsdiagnostic modelsmachine learningmajor depressive disorderuremia

Identifiers

PMID41112415
PMCPMC12527841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.