ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Technical considerations of neuroendoscopic management of obstructive hydrocephalus secondary to intraventricular hemorrhage.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a critical neurosurgical condition frequently complicated by acute obstructive hydrocephalus, requiring urgent intervention. While external ventricular drainage remains the classic and widely accessible treatment, neuroendoscopic techniques have emerged as a minimally invasive option that allows direct resolution of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow obstruction and, when indicated, hematoma evacuation. However, the literature provides limited technical guidance on neuroendoscopic management, particularly in settings with limited experience in this approach. Methods: We conducted a retrospective technical analysis of 12 patients with obstructive hydrocephalus secondary to IVH who underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), with or without hematoma evacuation. The study focuses on describing key procedural aspects, including intraventricular navigation strategies, relevant anatomical landmarks, and intraoperative decision-making processes. Results: The neuroendoscopic procedure was successfully completed in all 12 cases without any technique-related complications. Hematoma evacuation was performed when necessary, and CSF flow obstruction was effectively addressed in each case. Conclusion: This report provides a detailed technical description of ETV for the management of IVH-associated obstructive hydrocephalus. It emphasizes practical considerations aimed at supporting the safe implementation of neuroendoscopy in this context, particularly for centers with limited prior experience. The objective is not to conduct a comparative analysis or draw clinical outcome conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.