Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112398›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2025

Optimizing neurosurgical operating room schedule: Integrating machine learning models for operative time prediction and schedule design.

Karim Rizwan Nathani, Laura A Machlab, Hendrik L von Kentzinsky, Emily Feng, Nishantha Michael Jayasuriya, Ali-Muhammad Nathani, Sufyan Ibrahim, Archis Bhandarkar, Paul C Timm, Rushna Ali and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Karim Rizwan NathaniDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Laura A MachlabDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Hendrik L von KentzinskyDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Emily FengDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Nishantha Michael JayasuriyaDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Ali-Muhammad NathaniDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Southwest Minnesota State University, Marshall, Minnesota, United States.
Sufyan IbrahimDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Archis BhandarkarDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Paul C TimmDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Rushna AliDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Rabih G TawkDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
Brett FreedmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Mohamad BydonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Estimating operative time with low accuracy and precision leads to suboptimal scheduling of available operating rooms (ORs) and waste of healthcare resources. We aimed to develop a predictive machine learning (ML) model for operative time using our institutional data to improve the scheduling of neurosurgical ORs, minimize waste, and maximize resource utilization. Methods: We developed a predictive model using our institution's multicenter registry, which included diverse neurosurgical cases across three tertiary hospitals. We applied multiple ML techniques, including linear regression, support vector regression, deep neural networks, and extreme gradient boosting regression (XGBR). The best model was combined with the first fit decreasing bin-packing algorithm to create a practical OR scheduling system based on prior data. Results: The XGBR model exhibited the best performance, with lower mean absolute errors (MAEs) (root mean squared error: 52.24, MAE: 37.25) and higher R2 (0.76) values than other models. Implementing this model in a simulated OR scheduling scenario using institutional data, we successfully scheduled 30 random procedures with minimal residual time, such that the model ran out of procedures for the week with 86 and 171 min remaining in the cranial and spinal ORs, respectively, demonstrating potential efficiency gains. The cranial procedures were scheduled over 4 days and spinal procedures over 6 days, optimizing available OR time. Conclusion: Integrating ML models into operative time prediction can significantly improve the accuracy and efficiency of surgical schedules. This approach minimizes wasted OR time and enhances resource allocation, potentially improving patient outcomes and satisfaction by reducing waiting times.

Indexed as

Healthcare data analyticsHospital efficiencyNeural networksNeurosurgical operating room schedulingPredictive modelingValue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41112398
PMCPMC12530777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.