ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025
The prognostic significance of the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in neuroblastoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the potential prognostic value of fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) in patients with neuroblastoma (NB). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 257 patients with NB included as the training group, and 78 patients included as the validation group. The associations between NB and clinicopathological categorical variables based on FAR were assessed. Survival time and the corresponding survival curve were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were utilized to identify potential prognostic factors. A prognostic nomogram was constructed. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated using calibration curves. Results: Based on the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff value for FAR was found to be 0.0734. Both univariate and multivariate models demonstrated that FAR is a potential prognostic factor for overall survival in NB patients. Furthermore, the development of a nomogram based on the identified potential prognostic factors was predictive of the 3- and 5-year overall survival probabilities in both the training group and the validation group. Conclusion: FAR, a routinely performed test known for its simplicity, objectivity, and cost-effectiveness, has emerged as a promising prognostic factor in NB. Its potential applicability in clinical practice holds great promise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.