Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112328›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2025

Community co-design of research intervention materials to reduce cervical cancer disparities in Appalachia.

Dannell Boatman, Zachary Jarrett, Amie M Ashcraft, Treah Haggerty, Ryan D Baltic, Mark Cromo, Lindsay Hauser, Paul L Reiter, Mira L Katz, Abigail Shoben and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Dannell BoatmanSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Zachary JarrettSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Amie M AshcraftSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Treah HaggertySchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ryan D BalticComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mark CromoCollege of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Lindsay HauserCancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Paul L ReiterComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mira L KatzComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abigail ShobenComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mark DignanCollege of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Amy FerketichCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Roger T AndersonCancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Electra D PaskettComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Stephenie Kennedy-ReaSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Funding

Project 3: A Multilevel HPV Self-Testing Intervention to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in AppalachiaP01CA229143 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 2019 to 2023
$11.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA229143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose was to highlight the co-design process of intervention materials as part of a multi-site research collaborative designed to address the burden of cervical cancer incidence and mortality in the Appalachian region. Methods: Program documentation and research staff interviews were used to detail the six-step co-design process along with the eight-step community feedback loop used to develop intervention materials. Results: Feedback was received via key informant interviews and focus groups from healthcare providers ( Conclusion: Findings suggest that community co-design can be effectively integrated within a large, multi-state research collaborative to ensure intervention materials are reflective of the populations they are intended to reach. Innovation: A practical approach to co-design is described which can be adapted by other large, multi-site research studies. The types of community feedback that researchers can expect during this process are elucidated.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCo-designCommunity-engaged researchImplementation scienceParticipatory research

Identifiers

PMID41112328
PMCPMC12529350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.