Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112320›Full record

ArticleACS photonics2025

Discerning Amyloid‑β and Tau Pathologies with Learning-Based Quantum Sensing.

Shruti Sundar, Marakkarakath Vadakkepurayil Jabir, Lukas Glandorf, Maria Eleni Karakatsani, Michael Reiss, Ruiqing Ni, Daniel Razansky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS photonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shruti SundarInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2768-1321
Marakkarakath Vadakkepurayil JabirNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
Lukas GlandorfInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.
Maria Eleni KarakatsaniInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.
Michael ReissInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3583-3451
Ruiqing NiInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.
Daniel RazanskyInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photon entanglement, a key feature of quantum correlations, provides a level of coherence absent in classical correlations, potentially offering new information when interacting with biological matter. One promising application is using entanglement decoherence to distinguish between healthy and diseased samples. However, achieving this requires efficient entangled photon sources capable of surviving through biological samples for reliable detection. In this work, we show the applicability of a polarization-entangled photon source as a label-free diagnostic tool for distinguishing between transgenic mouse models of amyloidosis and tauopathy and their respective control strains. We investigated cortical and hippocampal regions of these models, and our findings revealed greater preservation of entanglement in the transgenic samples compared to controls. To further enhance classification accuracy, we employed a supervised machine learning approach, achieving reliable distinctions between disease and control groups in unseen test samples. The quantum-based results were further validated through confocal imaging of the transgenic and control samples. These findings suggest that quantum sensing could serve as a label-free approach for distinguishing biological samples, with potential applications in the study of neurodegenerative disorders.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseEntanglement decoherencepolarization entangled photonsspontaneous parametric down conversionsupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID41112320
PMCPMC12532366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.