ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Differential effects of immobilized CCL21 and ICAM1 on TILs with distinct expansion properties.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT), particularly tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)-based therapy holds great promise for cancer treatment, yet it still faces major challenges such as patient-to-patient variability in expansion rates and cytotoxic potency. Recent studies suggest that a "synthetic immune niche" (SIN), composed of immobilized CCL21 and ICAM-1, can enhance both the expansion and cytotoxicity of murine and patient-derived T cells. To explore the mechanisms underlying the variability of expansion and cytotoxic potency, we conducted morphological and molecular phenotyping of TIL specimens from different donors immediately following the pre-Rapid Expansion Protocol (pre-REP) stage, enabling us to predict their expansion potential. We further developed novel SIN-based strategies that differentially reinforce the efficacy of both low- and high-expanding TILs. Our experiments revealed two distinct TIL groups with either low- or high-proliferation properties, identified across cultures derived from different patients. We further demonstrate that a 14-day REP with feeder cells and SIN facilitates the proliferation of the low-expanding cells, while the expansion of high-expanding TILs benefits from a sequential expansion protocol, consisting of 7 days with feeder cells only, followed by 7 days with SIN treatment. At the end of the REP both TIL populations display high levels of granzyme B and perforin and reduced levels of exhaustion markers. Importantly, functional cytotoxicity assays using autologous tumor targets demonstrated that SIN stimulation improved the tumor-killing capacity of low-expanding TILs, while preserving the potent cytotoxicity of the high-expanding TILs. These data indicate that the refined CCL21+ICAM1 SIN treatment improves expansion rates and activation profiles of both TIL populations, thereby enabling a powerful, personalized SIN-enhanced protocol for TIL-based immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.