ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Comprehensive disproportionality analysis of individual case safety reports associated with Janus kinase inhibitors in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis using the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The development of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors has significantly expanded the therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, the distinct pharmacological profiles and target selectivity of these agents result in varying safety implications. This study systematically evaluates the safety of different JAK inhibitors in psoriasis and PsA patients. Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The disproportionality analysis methods, including reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC), were used to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) associated with the use of JAK inhibitors (deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib) in patients with psoriasis and PsA. To reduce potential confounding factors, sensitivity analysis was carried out. Results: A total of 167,807 worldwide individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of JAK inhibitors (Q4-2014 to Q3-2024) from 10,616 psoriasis and PsA patients were identified. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, infections and infestations, and gastrointestinal disorders were frequently reported AE signals for JAK inhibitors. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders were prominent AEs associated with upadacitinib and tofacitinib. The reporting rates of skin and subcutaneous tissue disorder AEs for deucravacitinib were higher than those for the other two drugs, whereas most other AE reporting rates for deucravacitinib were lower. Some AEs that have not been reported in the drug prescribing information deserve further attention. Subgroup analysis suggested that female subjects had a higher likelihood of developing skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders after taking tofacitinib. Comparisons between psoriasis and PsA indicated that AE signals were generally comparable across the two indications. Conclusions: This research offers practical evidence for assessing the safety of JAK inhibitors used in psoriasis and PsA. Since disproportionality analysis serves as a hypothesis-generating approach, the results necessitate further validation in studies with denominator data to assess causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.