Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112262›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Comprehensive disproportionality analysis of individual case safety reports associated with Janus kinase inhibitors in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis using the FAERS database.

Kunhong Deng, Han Jiang, Shan Xie, Minghui Yin, Chengjun Guo, Longjian Huang, Junlong Ma, Yun Kuang, Yuxia Xiang, Chengxian Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kunhong Deng *Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Han Jiang *Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shan XieCenter of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Minghui YinCenter of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chengjun GuoSchool of Applied Mathematics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Longjian HuangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China.
Junlong MaCenter of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yun KuangCenter of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yuxia XiangCenter of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chengxian GuoCenter of Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The development of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors has significantly expanded the therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, the distinct pharmacological profiles and target selectivity of these agents result in varying safety implications. This study systematically evaluates the safety of different JAK inhibitors in psoriasis and PsA patients. Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The disproportionality analysis methods, including reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC), were used to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) associated with the use of JAK inhibitors (deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib) in patients with psoriasis and PsA. To reduce potential confounding factors, sensitivity analysis was carried out. Results: A total of 167,807 worldwide individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of JAK inhibitors (Q4-2014 to Q3-2024) from 10,616 psoriasis and PsA patients were identified. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, infections and infestations, and gastrointestinal disorders were frequently reported AE signals for JAK inhibitors. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders were prominent AEs associated with upadacitinib and tofacitinib. The reporting rates of skin and subcutaneous tissue disorder AEs for deucravacitinib were higher than those for the other two drugs, whereas most other AE reporting rates for deucravacitinib were lower. Some AEs that have not been reported in the drug prescribing information deserve further attention. Subgroup analysis suggested that female subjects had a higher likelihood of developing skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders after taking tofacitinib. Comparisons between psoriasis and PsA indicated that AE signals were generally comparable across the two indications. Conclusions: This research offers practical evidence for assessing the safety of JAK inhibitors used in psoriasis and PsA. Since disproportionality analysis serves as a hypothesis-generating approach, the results necessitate further validation in studies with denominator data to assess causal relationships.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsArthritis, PsoriaticJanus Kinase InhibitorsPsoriasisAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacovigilancePiperidinesPyrimidinesPyrrolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingJanus Kinase InhibitorsPiperidinesPyrimidinesPyrrolestofacitinibupadacitinibdisproportionality analysisFAERSJanus kinase inhibitorspharmacovigilancepsoriasispsoriatic arthritis

Identifiers

PMID41112262
PMCPMC12529101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.