ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Artificial intelligence-driven analysis of antibody and nucleic acid biomarkers for enhanced disease diagnostics.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has catalyzed a paradigm shift in the landscape of biomarker-driven disease diagnostics, particularly in the context of integrating antibody and nucleic acid indicators. Within this transformative setting, AI offers unprecedented potential for decoding complex molecular interactions across heterogeneous data sources, facilitating early and precise disease identification. However, the effective deployment of AI in this domain mandates enhanced model interpretability, robust cross-domain generalization, and biologically grounded learning strategies-challenges that resonate deeply with contemporary research focused on antibody and nucleic acid diagnostics. Methods: Traditional methodologies for biomarker discovery-such as linear regression, random forests, and even standard deep neural networks-struggle to accommodate the multi-scale dependencies and missingness typical of omics datasets. These models often lack the structural alignment with biological processes, resulting in limited translational utility and poor generalization to new biomedical contexts. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework that integrates a biologically informed architecture, BioGraphAI, and a semi-supervised learning strategy, adaptive contextual knowledge regularization (ACKR). BioGraphAI employs a hierarchical graph attention mechanism tailored to capture interactions across genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic modalities. These interactions are guided by biological priors derived from curated pathway databases. Results: This architecture not only supports cross-modal data fusion under incomplete observations but also promotes interpretability via structured attention and pathway-level embeddings. ACKR complements this model by incorporating weak supervision signals from large-scale biomedical corpora and structured ontologies, ensuring biological plausibility through latent space regularization and group-wise consistency constraints. Discussion: Together, BioGraphAI and ACKR represent a step toward overcoming critical barriers in biomarker-driven disease diagnostics. By grounding computational predictions in biological priors and enhancing interpretability through structured embeddings, this framework advances the translational applicability of AI for early and precise disease identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.