ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: long-term evidence from cardiac devices.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery occurs in 20%-40% of cases and is associated with significant morbidity. Studies have shown an association with immediate postoperative AF (POAF) and recurrent AF; however, to our knowledge, no trials have used continuous electrogram monitoring data from cardiac devices (pacemakers or defibrillators) to assess the rate of long-term AF recurrence. Methods: Using institutional databases, we identified patients with a cardiac device who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or a procedure on their aortic valve (AV) or mitral valve (MV) between January 2011 and March 2020. POAF and comorbidities were assessed using the electronic patient record, and recurrent device-detected AF was defined as any episode of AF lasting >6 min on device check between 6 weeks and 18 months postoperatively. Results: POAF was associated with recurrent device-detected AF ( Discussion: Postoperative is associated with a threefold greater odds of developing recurrent device-detected AF: it is not a simple transient phenomenon. Larger prospective studies are required to identify which patients would benefit from heart rhythm surveillance and whether OAC is an effective treatment in this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.