ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Freezing dynamics of dough under molecular hydrogen-fumigation assisted immersion: quality and structural responses to freezing and thawing cycles.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of hydrogen fumigation-assisted -25 °C immersion freezing (HFIF) on the freezing process of frozen dough (FD) and quality attributes throughout freeze-thaw cycles were elucidated in this study. Results showed that HFIF significantly increased the phase transition rate to 1.82 times and 2.18 times that of -25 °C immersion freezing (IF) and -80 °C quick freezing (QF), respectively. LF-NMR and MRI analyses indicated that HFIF accelerated phase transition and overall freezing rate. HFIF minimized the freezing-induced morphological damage of FD and retained superior mechanical properties. It also prevented gluten disulfide bond cleavage (39.61 % and 14.20 % higher than in IF and QF, respectively) while curtailing gluten macromolecule depolymerization and increasing α-helix content by 14.53 % and 14.05 % relative to IF and QF (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.