ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2025
Health system drivers of caesarean deliveries in south Asia: a scoping review.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cesarean epidemic in Bangladesh: Associated factors and maternal health risks.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Impact of Elective Caesarean Delivery on Double Burden of Malnutrition and Its Contribution to Wealth-Based Inequality: A Decomposition Analysis Across South Asian Countries.Public health challenges · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caesarean section (CS) rates are rising across south Asia, often without medical indication, posing significant public health concerns. This Review applied a framework-guided evidence synthesis using a scoping review approach, structured by the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), to examine health system drivers of CS. Seventy-five studies were included, mainly from India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. At the individual level, maternal education, socioeconomic status, and birth order influenced CS use. Community-level drivers included family preferences and media exposure. At the provider level, decision-making was shaped by financial incentives, medico-legal concerns, and scheduling convenience. Other system-level drivers, such as private sector dominance, limited regulation, and insurance coverage, were associated with increased CS rates. While most findings aligned with the SEM, some extended beyond its scope. The Review highlights the need for coordinated policy responses across levels, including payment reforms, regulatory oversight, and improved antenatal counselling, to ensure CS use aligns with clinical need rather than socio-economic or institutional pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.