Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112119›Full record

ArticleCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

AmpC β-lactamases: A key to antibiotic resistance in ESKAPE pathogens.

Deeksha Pandey, Isha Gupta, Dinesh Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deeksha PandeyTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India.
Isha GuptaTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India.
Dinesh GuptaTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: AmpC β-lactamases ( Results: We identified 1790 AmpC enzymes in 4713 complete genomes, classified into nine enzyme groups. Consistent with known taxonomic profiles, no class C β-lactamases were detected in Gram-positive bacteria ( Conclusions: We identified 1790 AmpC enzymes in nine distinct groups across ESKAPE pathogens, with species-specific distribution patterns and notable absence in Gram-positive bacteria. The PIB enzyme group demonstrated unique motif variants (YST/AQG) conferring carbapenem resistance, while other groups maintained conserved catalytic motifs. Phylogenetic analysis revealed evolutionary divergence and horizontal gene transfer potential, emphasizing the need for targeted therapeutic approaches against AmpC-mediated resistance.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceCephalosporinaseChromosomeNosocomial infectionsPlasmid

Identifiers

PMID41112119
PMCPMC12528871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.