Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112067›Full record

ArticleThe International journal, advanced manufacturing technology2025

Human factors in digital manufacturing technology adoption: a workforce perspective.

Anne-Marie Oostveen, Iveta Eimontaite, Sarah Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne-Marie OostveenCentre for Robotics and Assembly, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences (FEAS), Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL UK.
Iveta EimontaiteCentre for Robotics and Assembly, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences (FEAS), Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL UK.
Sarah FletcherCentre for Robotics and Assembly, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences (FEAS), Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UK is the twelfth-largest manufacturing nation globally, yet its adoption of digital manufacturing technologies (DMTs) lags behind other European countries. In an era where industrial automation and digital transformation are essential for maintaining competitiveness, understanding the human factors influencing the acceptance and implementation of these technologies is critical. This study examines the perceptions of 313 UK manufacturing employees regarding the usefulness, ease of use, and workplace impact of DMTs. Findings indicate that while employees recognise the potential benefits of DMTs such as increased productivity, improved product quality, and enhanced competitiveness, concerns remain regarding ease of use, workforce upskilling, and physical interaction with new technologies. Notably, employees with lower educational qualifications expressed greater scepticism about the applicability of DMTs. Furthermore, those working in companies that had already implemented digital technologies reported more positive perceptions compared to non-users, emphasising the role of experience in shaping attitudes. The study highlights the need for targeted training and change management strategies to facilitate smoother workforce adaptation to digital advancements. These findings provide insights for policymakers, industry leaders, and system designers aiming to integrate human-centric approaches in the transition to Industry 4.0 and beyond.

Indexed as

Digital manufacturing technologiesHuman factorsIndustry 4.0Technology acceptanceUser and non-usersWorkforce adaptation

Identifiers

PMID41112067
PMCPMC12534235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.