ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2025
Landmark- vs Ultrasound-Guided Intercostobrachial Nerve Block and Serratus Plane Block after Supraclavicular Plexus Block for Medial Arm AV Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective postoperative pain management is necessary to enhance patient recovery and satisfaction following the creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Objectives: This work compares the role of Ultrasound (US) guided and landmark-guided Intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) block and serratus plane block (SPB) after supraclavicular plexus block (SCPB) for anesthesia in the creation of AVF in the medial side of the arm. Methods: This randomized, double-blind trial was carried out on 75 patients, 18 - 65 years old, both sexes undergoing creation AVF in the medial side of the arm. Participants were randomized equally into three groups receiving SCPB, followed by traditional landmark ICBN (TICBN) in group T, US-guided ICBN in group U, or US-guided SPB in group S. Results: Groups U and S needed less local anesthesia supplementation than group T (8%, 12%, 44%, P < 0.05). Time for first rescue analgesia was delayed in U and S as opposed to T, and in U as opposed to S (P < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption was diminished in U and S than T, and in U than S (P < 0.001). Visual Analogue Scale scores were diminished in U and S as opposed to T at 2 and 4 hours, with no difference between U and S; at 8 hours, T and U had diminished VAS than S (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was better in the U than in the T and S (P = 0.002). Conclusions: US guided ICBN and SPB provide superior anesthesia and postoperative analgesia as opposed to TICBN following the creation of AVF in the arm medial side.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.