Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112065›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2025

Simulating Federated Learning to Enable Multi-Hospital Collaboration for Lumbopelvic Alignment Estimation.

Andrea Cina, Miklovana Tuci, Ferran Pellisé, Caglar Yilgor, Ahmet Alanay, Javier Pizones, Frank Kleinstück, Ibrahim Obeid, Yann Philippe Charles, Sarah Richner-Wunderlin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrea CinaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich Universitätstrasse 2 Zürich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6016-6200
Miklovana TuciDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich Universitätstrasse 2 Zürich Switzerland.
Ferran PelliséSpine Research Unit Vall d'Hebron Research Institute Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0644-7757
Caglar YilgorDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology Acibadem University Istanbul Turkey.
Ahmet AlanayDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology Acibadem University Istanbul Turkey.
Javier PizonesSpine Surgery Unit La Paz University Hospital Madrid Spain.
Frank KleinstückSpine Center Division Schulthess Clinic Zurich Switzerland.
Ibrahim ObeidSpine Surgery Unit Bordeaux University Hospital Bordeaux France.
Yann Philippe CharlesDepartment of Spine Surgery University Hospital of Strasbourg Strasbourg France.
Sarah Richner-WunderlinSchulthess Clinic, Department of Teaching, Research and Development Zürich Switzerland.
Fabio GalbuseraSchulthess Clinic, Department of Teaching, Research and Development Zürich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-9190
Catherine R JutzelerDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich Universitätstrasse 2 Zürich Switzerland.
European Spine Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate computation of radiological parameters related to spinal alignment is clinically crucial for diagnosing and managing conditions, such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and adult spinal deformities. Key parameters, including sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and lumbar lordosis, are required to assess lumbosacral alignment. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has demonstrated strong potential in automating these assessments, reducing clinician workload and improving consistency. However, AI models require large, diverse, high-quality datasets to perform reliably across different clinical settings. Privacy concerns and data ownership issues often hinder data sharing, limiting the creation of centralized datasets. Methods: In this study, we demonstrate that federated learning (FL) enables the training of deep learning models across four hospitals without compromising patient privacy. In particular, we compared FL against a centralized approach, where data from all the hospitals are pooled together and a model is trained on them, and a local approach consisting of training individual models exclusively on data from each respective hospital, resulting in distinct hospital-specific models. Results: FL achieved performance comparable to centralized training (errors ~5°), where data is pooled, and consistently outperformed models trained on data from individual hospitals, both in internal (~8°) and external (~10°) testing. Conclusion: This work highlights FL as a viable solution for collaborative AI development in spinal imaging, facilitating the use of diverse, multi-institutional data while circumventing privacy barriers and complex data-sharing agreements. Additionally, FL demonstrates particular benefits for smaller hospitals, enabling them to achieve superior model performance by effectively leveraging data from hospitals with larger datasets.

Indexed as

automatic assessmentdeep learningfederated learningprivacyspine parameters

Identifiers

PMID41112065
PMCPMC12529873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.