Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112051›Full record

ArticleiMeta2025

Xiaofang Yao, Jiqiu Wu, Tengfei Ma, Chun-Lin Shi, Canhui Lan, Danyi Li, Jingyuan Fu, Ziang Shen, Tong Chen, Yong-Xin Liu

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in iMeta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaofang YaoGenome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Shenzhen China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3434-6996
Jiqiu WuAPC Microbiome Institute University College Cork Cork Ireland.
Tengfei MaState Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Centre for Grassland Microbiome, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University Lanzhou China.
Chun-Lin ShiANGENOVO Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-8947
Canhui LanNingbo R-Institute of Science Communication Ningbo China.
Danyi LiNingbo R-Institute of Science Communication Ningbo China.
Jingyuan FuDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Ziang ShenSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou China.
Tong ChenState Key Laboratory for Quality Ensurance and Sustainable Use of Dao-di Herbs, National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing China.
Yong-Xin LiuGenome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Shenzhen China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1832-9835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media platforms have revolutionized scientific communication by bridging gaps between researchers, academic journals, and global audiences. This article showcases

Identifiers

PMID41112051
PMCPMC12527989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.