Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112043›Full record

ArticleiMeta2025

Fuli Deng, Chang Yin, Chengzeng Luo, Ye Xu, Yuxia Chen, Ruqing Zhong, Shanlong Tang, Hongfu Zhang, Liang Chen

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in iMeta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bacillus velezensis alleviates PMAnimal microbiome · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. iMeta · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fuli DengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Chang YinState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Chengzeng LuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Ye XuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Yuxia ChenState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Ruqing ZhongState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Shanlong TangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Hongfu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Liang ChenState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8748-0515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between functional oligosaccharides and small intestinal cells are increasingly recognized as critical for maintaining intestinal health. Using xylooligosaccharides (XOS) as a model, we demonstrate that XOS promote growth in piglets primarily by enhancing nutrient transport and increasing villus height in the jejunum. These effects are mediated by XOS-driven modulation of the intestinal microbiota, particularly the enrichment of

Identifiers

PMID41112043
PMCPMC12527980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.