ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Regulatory Measures for the Use of Natural Ecological Space Based on the Remote Sensing-Driven PLUS-InVEST Model: A Case Study From the Central Mountainous Area of Hainan Island.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unreasonable reclamation and construction activities have led to a decline in habitat quality and loss of biodiversity in tropical rainforest areas, especially in key biodiversity regions globally. To evaluate the effectiveness of natural ecological space use regulation measures, in this study, the remote sensing data-driven PLUS-InVEST coupled model was used to evaluate and forecast the habitat quality and degree of degradation in the central mountainous region of Hainan Island, a global biodiversity hotspot. By setting natural ecological space use control measures, namely Ecological Conservation Redline, the spatiotemporal variations in land use/land cover and habitat quality were investigated under two regulatory scenarios: natural development (ND) and ecological priority (EP). The study revealed that: (1) Under the natural development (ND) regulatory scenario, from 2007 to 2021, artificial ecosystems such as farmland, water bodies, and construction land showed an increasing trend, while natural ecosystems such as forests, shrubs, and grasslands exhibited a decreasing trend in the study area. (2) Between 2007 and 2021, the habitat quality in the study area exhibited a decreasing trend, with a total reduction of 3.12%. (3) From 2021 to 2035, compared to the natural development (ND) scenario, under the ecological priority (EP) regulatory scenario, influenced by the Ecological Conservation Redline, the area of natural ecosystems in the study area showed an increasing trend, with an overall improvement in habitat quality by 0.34%, an increase in excellent quality habitat area of 57.12 km
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.