Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112020›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2025

Termite Vibration Sensing: The Chordotonal Organs and Their Appendages.

Travers M Sansom, Joseph C S Lai, Benjamin J Halkon, Theodore A Evans, Sebastian Oberst

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Travers M SansomCentre for Audio, Acoustics and Vibration University of Technology Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Joseph C S LaiSchool of Engineering and Technology University of New South Wales Canberra Campbell Australian Capital Territory Australia.
Benjamin J HalkonCentre for Audio, Acoustics and Vibration University of Technology Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Theodore A EvansSchool of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia.
Sebastian OberstCentre for Audio, Acoustics and Vibration University of Technology Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1388-2749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eusocial insects like termites and ants use diverse communication methods, including pheromones, sound, and vibrations. Termites, blind and with fewer glands, rely heavily on vibrations for foraging, communication, and predator avoidance. Their appendages detect subtle signals amid noise, though the underlying physiological mechanisms remain largely unknown and understudied. We explore the role of termite legs and antennae as sensory probes. These appendages receive the vibration signals, which are detected by the leg's subgenual organ and the Johnston's organ in the antenna, and which in turn convert these mechanical environmental signals into nerve impulses sent to the nervous system. We compare these appendages in termites and ants, two eusocial, subterranean insect groups that share ecological traits but differ in trophic roles, with ants being major predators of termites. Termite legs and antennae have lower slenderness ratios (legs: 19-35 vs. 48; antennae: 23-32 vs. 61). Wasps and bees fall in between. Assuming similar material properties, termite legs likely have lower stiffness and higher natural frequencies, enhancing vibration sensitivity. The subgenual organ's position near the head may further improve detection. These morphological traits suggest termites could be better adapted for sensing a broader range of vibrations than ants. However, more specimens and species of Isoptera and Formica need to be tested to validate this claim fully. Comparing the legs of termites with ants, we found that termite tibiae amplify lower-frequency vibrations (~0-2.25 kHz), while ants show an amplification at higher frequencies (1.9-3.1 kHz). This suggests the vibrational sensitivity of termites is better adapted to wood-borne signals, which corresponds to their food, whereas ants, as generalist foragers, are tuned for diverse terrains, including light structures, such as twigs, leaves, and other plant matter. Considered together, our findings suggest that termite legs may function as an integrated auditory complex.

Indexed as

biotremologyIsopteraJohnston's organsignal amplificationsubgenual organsubstrate‐borne vibration

Identifiers

PMID41112020
PMCPMC12531595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.