ReviewEcology and evolution2025
Termite Vibration Sensing: The Chordotonal Organs and Their Appendages.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Termite Vibration Sensing: The Chordotonal Organs and Their Appendages.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eusocial insects like termites and ants use diverse communication methods, including pheromones, sound, and vibrations. Termites, blind and with fewer glands, rely heavily on vibrations for foraging, communication, and predator avoidance. Their appendages detect subtle signals amid noise, though the underlying physiological mechanisms remain largely unknown and understudied. We explore the role of termite legs and antennae as sensory probes. These appendages receive the vibration signals, which are detected by the leg's subgenual organ and the Johnston's organ in the antenna, and which in turn convert these mechanical environmental signals into nerve impulses sent to the nervous system. We compare these appendages in termites and ants, two eusocial, subterranean insect groups that share ecological traits but differ in trophic roles, with ants being major predators of termites. Termite legs and antennae have lower slenderness ratios (legs: 19-35 vs. 48; antennae: 23-32 vs. 61). Wasps and bees fall in between. Assuming similar material properties, termite legs likely have lower stiffness and higher natural frequencies, enhancing vibration sensitivity. The subgenual organ's position near the head may further improve detection. These morphological traits suggest termites could be better adapted for sensing a broader range of vibrations than ants. However, more specimens and species of Isoptera and Formica need to be tested to validate this claim fully. Comparing the legs of termites with ants, we found that termite tibiae amplify lower-frequency vibrations (~0-2.25 kHz), while ants show an amplification at higher frequencies (1.9-3.1 kHz). This suggests the vibrational sensitivity of termites is better adapted to wood-borne signals, which corresponds to their food, whereas ants, as generalist foragers, are tuned for diverse terrains, including light structures, such as twigs, leaves, and other plant matter. Considered together, our findings suggest that termite legs may function as an integrated auditory complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.