Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41112014›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Can artificial intelligence improve the diagnosis and management of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis?

Iyad A Issa, Osama Youssef, Taly Issa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Iyad A IssaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Harley Street Medical Center, Abu Dhabi 41475, United Arab Emirates. iyadissa71@gmail.com.
Osama YoussefDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 112412, United Arab Emirates.
Taly IssaMedical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 24005, Cyprus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated condition leading to esophageal inflammation and a range of symptomatic complications if inadequately managed. Recent epidemiological trends indicate a significant increase in EoE prevalence, complicating patient care amid diagnostic challenges associated with conventional methods such as endoscopy and histopathological analysis. This review explores the promise of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning models in enhancing the diagnosis and management of EoE, addressing the limitations of traditional approaches including inter-observer variability, invasiveness, and delays in diagnosis. By synthesizing findings from peer-reviewed studies, we demonstrate that AI algorithms exhibit high diagnostic accuracy in recognizing subtle endoscopic features and quantifying eosinophilic tissue infiltration. Moreover, these technologies can streamline workflows, reduce dependency on manual assessments, and enhance personalized care strategies. Despite the potential benefits, challenges regarding the integration of AI into clinical practice remain, including issues of algorithmic bias, data privacy, and the need for robust validation across diverse healthcare settings. Future research should focus on multicenter studies to confirm AI's effectiveness, explore non-invasive diagnostic alternatives, and promote the ethical application of AI to optimize patient outcomes in EoE. This review highlights AI's transformative capacity to reshape the diagnostic landscape of EoE, underscoring the requirement for ongoing evaluation and collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and technology developers to realize its full potential within the healthcare framework.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEosinophilic EsophagitisAlgorithmsDeep LearningEsophagoscopyEsophagusHumansArtificial intelligenceDeep learningEosinophilic esophagitisEsophagusInflammation

Identifiers

PMID41112014
PMCPMC12531812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.