ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of clipping prior to cyanoacrylate embolization in gastric varices: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Gastric varices: a contemporary review of vascular anatomy and therapeutic strategies.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Pathophysiological management of gastric varices: From hemodynamics to targeted therapies.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2026Review
- Gastric varices management: Is clip-assisted glue injection a real-world alternative to endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe high rebleeding rate and severe adverse events have raised concerns regarding the safety of endoscopic cyanoacrylate as a conventional treatment for gastric variceal hemorrhage. Clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (Clip-CYA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil and cyanoacrylate injection (EUS-CG) are two currently used modalities. There are limited data comparing the two techniques.
aimTo compare the efficacy, safety, and procedural characteristics of Clip-CYA
methodsBetween April 2019 and August 2023, 162 patients with GVs and concomitant gastrorenal or splenorenal shunts who underwent either Clip-CYA or EUS-CG at our center were included. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 108 patients were included in the final analysis. The evaluated outcomes included the amount of cyanoacrylate, eradication of GVs, cyanoacrylate embolization, all-cause rebleeding, operating time and endoscopic therapy costs.
resultsOf the 108 patients, 72 (male, 83.3%; mean age, 56.2 ± 10.8 years) received Clip-CYA, and 36 (male, 72.2%; mean age, 59.1 ± 10.7 years) received EUS-CG. The amount of cyanoacrylate used, rates of obliteration of GVs and all-cause rebleeding were similar between the two groups (2.0 ± 1.1 mL
conclusionCompared with EUS-CG, Clip-CYA of GVs appears to be a safe procedure with shorter operating times and lower endoscopic therapy costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.