Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111996›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing management2025

Outcome Reporting in Clinical Trials on Kangaroo Mother Care in Newborns: A Systematic Review for the Development of Core Outcome Set.

Ying Xin Li, Yan Ling Hu, Han Mei Peng, Yuan Li, Xia Li, Wen Qian Su, Xiao Wen Li, Qiong Chen, Xing Li Wan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying Xin LiDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5636-4418
Yan Ling HuDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Han Mei PengDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yuan LiDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5550-0307
Xia LiDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wen Qian SuDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiao Wen LiDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qiong ChenDepartment of Neonatology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4926-8190
Xing Li WanKey Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8731-7398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) reduces mortality and morbidity in newborns, particularly benefiting preterm infants. However, substantial heterogeneity in the selection, measurement, and reporting of outcomes across KMC trials hinders evidence synthesis and clinical application, underscoring the urgent need for standardized core outcomes. Objective: To identify outcomes used to evaluate KMC as the foundational step toward developing a core outcome set. Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement for reporting. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, SinoMed, WanFang Data, and clinical trial registries was conducted for studies published or registered from January 1, 2014 to July 7, 2024. Risk of bias in the studies was not assessed, as the review did not focus on efficacy. Data on literature and outcomes were extracted for narrative synthesis. Outcomes were categorized using the COMET outcome taxonomy. Results: A total of 5730 studies were screened, and 292 studies were included in this review, consisting of 162 articles and 130 protocols, with a total of 112,601 participants. These studies were conducted across 40 countries, with the majority from lower-middle-income countries and upper-middle-income countries. A total of 1306 outcomes were extracted, resulting in 142 unique outcomes, which spanned 5 core areas and 29 outcome domains. The most frequently reported core area was physiological/clinical (256 studies, 87.67%), followed by the life impact (116 studies, 39.73%). In contrast, the death core area received limited attention, with only 10.96% of studies reporting mortality or survival outcomes. The most commonly reported outcome domain was general outcomes (185 studies, 63.36%), followed by pregnancy, puerperium, and perinatal outcomes (84 studies, 28.77%). The three most reported outcomes were breastfeeding outcomes (84 studies, 28.77%), weight/length/head circumference/(82 studies, 28.08%), and pain (67 studies, 22.95%). Conclusions: Current research on outcome reporting for KMC is comprehensive, covering most outcome domain across the five core areas. However, significant heterogeneity in outcome definitions and reporting exists across studies. Therefore, the development of a core outcome set for KMC is critical to reduce this heterogeneity, facilitate comparisons between studies, and enhance the integration of results into clinical practice and future research.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationKangaroo-Mother Care MethodOutcome Assessment, Health CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Prematurecore outcome setevidence-based medicineinfantkangaroo-mother care methodnewbornsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41111996
PMCPMC12530923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.