ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Using the Score for Trauma Triage for Geriatric and Middle-aged (STTGMA) to Cluster High-Risk Hip Fracture Patients for Hospice Discharge.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hip fracture patients may be hospice candidates if life expectancy is < 6 months. This study evaluates STTGMAHIP FX's ability to identify high-risk hip fracture patients for hospice discharge at emergency room presentation to guide end-of-life care planning. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained registry of patients aged ≥55 with low-energy hip fractures (2014-2024) was conducted. Patients were stratified by STTGMAHIP FX percentiles: minimal (≤50th), low (50th-<80th), moderate (80th-<97.5th), and high (≥97.5th). Demographics, injury characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was identification of Hospice Discharge Candidates (HDCs), defined as discharge to hospice during the index admission, inpatient mortality >48 h after surgery, or mortality <6 months post-operation. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was compared to STTGMAHIP FX for the ability to cluster HDCs using area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis and a two-proportion Z-test. Results: Among 2777 patients (mean age 81.18 ± 9.80 years), HDC incidence rose with STTGMAHIP FX risk level: 2.9% (minimal risk), 5.9% (low risk), 14.2% (moderate risk), and 29.6% (high risk) (p < 0.05). Only 17.0% of patients classified as ASA 4 were HDCs. Additionally, STTGMAHIP FX demonstrated a slightly better ability to discriminate HDCs compared to ASA, although not statistically significant (0.719 vs 0.683; p = 0.138). However, the STTGMAHIP FX high risk stratification was much more useful in identifying HDCs than ASA (29.6% vs 17.0%; p = 0.013). Conclusion: STTGMAHIP FX identifies hospice-eligible hip fracture patients more effectively than ASA. High-risk patients per STTGMAHIP FX demonstrate elevated 6-month mortality and may benefit from early hospice planning at admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.