ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Prediction of hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis based on machine learning models combined with platelet distribution width-to-count ratio.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for hemorrhagic transformation after tenecteplase therapy in acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective observational study.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Neutrophil extracellular traps and microglia/macrophages interactions in stroke: from thromboinflammation to immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a common and potentially serious complication following intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite its high incidence, there remains a lack of simple and effective tools for predicting HT risk. Objective: This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model incorporating the platelet distribution width to platelet count ratio (PPR) to predict HT occurrence in AIS patients after IVT. Methods: We included AIS patients who underwent IVT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between July 2019 and April 2024. Four ML models-logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost)-were constructed using 5-fold cross-validation, with HT after IVT as the outcome. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and balanced F-score. The best-performing model was selected for interpretability analysis, and feature importance was assessed. Results: LASSO regression identified six predictive features with non-zero coefficients: age, diabetes, malignancy, onset-to-treatment time (OTT), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and PPR. Among the models, LR demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an optimal AUC of 0.919, along with average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.825, 0.830, and 0.832, respectively. Feature importance in the LR model ranked as follows: baseline NIHSS score, diabetes, PPR, malignancy, age, and OTT. Conclusion: The LR-based model incorporating PPR effectively predicts HT risk in AIS patients after IVT, providing clinicians with a rapid and accurate tool to assess thrombolytic hemorrhage risk and support treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.