ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Normative data for the 10-min lean test in adults without orthostatic intolerance.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orthostatic intolerance syndromes such as Orthostatic Hypotension (OH) and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS) are common symptoms seen in post-infection conditions and other neurological conditions with autonomic dysfunction. The 10-min Lean Test (LT) is an objective clinical test used to assess these symptoms and direct management. There is, however, no robust literature on normative data for this test, particularly from a younger population. Aims: The aim of this study was to produce a healthy control data set for LT, which can be used for comparison with the patient population with health conditions. Methods: Individuals recruited into the study had no history or symptoms of orthostatic intolerance; autonomic dysfunction; post-infection conditions (such as long COVID); or other neurological conditions with hemodynamic instability. Participants were primarily recruited from the general population in a metropolitan city. All participants underwent a standardized LT. Lying Blood Pressure (BP) and Heart Rate (HR) after 2 min of lying down supine was recorded, followed by BP and HR recordings at every minute of standing (leaning against a wall) up to 10 min, along with recording subject-reported symptoms at each time point. Results: A complete dataset was available for 112 individuals (60.7% Female, 39.3% Male). The population was 61.6% Caucasian, 8.0% Asian, 3.6% Black/Caribbean, 9.8% Mixed, and 17.0% Other; the mean age was 35.3 ± 15.1, with a BMI of 24.8 ± 4.0; 30.6% of individuals had a background medical condition, but none of the exclusion criteria. During LT, upon standing, the average change of HR was an increase of 9.89 ± 8.15 bpm. The sustained HR increase (HR increase sustained at two consecutive readings) was an average of 6.23 ± 6.94 bpm. The predominant response with BP was an increase of systolic BP, with the average initial increase being 7.55 ± 10.88 mmHg. None of the participants met the diagnostic criteria for symptomatic OH or PoTS during LT. Conclusion: For the first time in the current literature, 10-min LT data from a relatively younger population without orthostatic intolerance have been gathered. This normative data will help interpret LT findings in younger patients with orthostatic Intolerance better and be useful in managing dysautonomia in specific conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.