Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111953›Full record

ArticleEthics & behavior2025

Incidental Genetic Findings Discovered During Autopsy: An Ethical Analysis of Patient Confidentiality Post-Mortem.

Brooke Ortiz, Lauren B Solberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethics & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brooke OrtizUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States of America.
Lauren B SolbergUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States of America.

Funding

STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLST35HL007489 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Scott A Berceli, Robert Maile · 1985 to 2026
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protections for patient confidentiality during life prove essential for effective healthcare. However, post-mortem, these protections can cease. Postmortem, technological advancements enhance autopsy evaluations but also contribute to incidental findings during autopsy. An incidental finding, unrelated to the cause of death, can include genetic conditions which can have significant implications for family members of the deceased. The ethical and legal implications of disclosing incidental findings with genetic components to family members of a deceased patient are evaluated in this research and advance directives are explored as a possible solution to protecting patient confidentiality post-mortem.

Indexed as

advance directiveautopsyEthicsgeneticincidental findings

Identifiers

PMID41111953
PMCPMC12533811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.