ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Evaluation as a translational resource: Bridging social sciences with clinical and translational sciences to advance university, health system, and community initiatives.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring what matters: Modern evaluation practices in clinical and translational science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation supports the translation of knowledge into practice by systematically assessing what works, for whom, and under what conditions. It generates evidence to guide improvements, inform decision-making, and identify how programs, research studies, or interventions should be scaled. Within a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hub, evaluation is typically focused on internal evaluation and administrative functions. However, expanding evaluation to also support efforts based outside of a CTSA hub (i.e., to the larger institution and community), akin to other CTSA cores and services, can support overarching translational goals. This paper outlines the process and benefits of institutionalizing a partnership between clinical and translational science and social science to provide expertise, resulting in evaluation as a translational resource. Herein, we describe developing the Duke Office of Evaluation and Applied Research Partnership, an organizational unit that, by bridging a university's CTSA hub and interdisciplinary social science institute, expanded the scope and capacity of evaluation to advance clinical and translational science. We outline the specific activities supported by this initiative, facilitators involved in its establishment, and barriers to implementation and success. This model and lessons learned can inform broader opportunities to leverage multidisciplinary evaluation expertise to support clinical and translational science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.