Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111921›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Center2025

The multifaceted impact of circadian disruption on cancer risk: a systematic review of insights and economic implications.

Vicente Javier Clemente-Suarez, Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez, Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo, Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco, Pedro Belinchón-deMiguel, Domingo Jesús Ramos-Campo, Carlota Valeria Villanueva-Tobaldo, Alexandra Martín-Rodríguez, Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Metastasis in biological time.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vicente Javier Clemente-SuarezFaculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo Navarro-JiménezFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Juan Camilo Benitez-AgudeloUniversidad de la Costa, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Ana Isabel Beltrán-VelascoPsychology Department, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida y la Naturaleza, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Belinchón-deMiguelFaculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Domingo Jesús Ramos-CampoLFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Science-INEF, Madrid, Spain.
Carlota Valeria Villanueva-TobaldoGraduate School of Business, Universidad ESAN, Alonso de Molina 1652, Santiago de Surco, Lima, Peru.
Alexandra Martín-RodríguezFaculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Francisco Tornero-AguileraGraduate School of Business, Universidad ESAN, Alonso de Molina 1652, Santiago de Surco, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Circadian disruption has emerged as a significant risk factor for cancer, driven by mechanisms such as hormonal imbalances, impaired DNA repair, immune suppression, and metabolic dysregulation. Modern societal patterns-shift work, artificial light at night, and irregular sleep schedules-have exacerbated these risks. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, screening over 500 studies published between 2003 and 2023 from PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed epidemiological and mechanistic studies linking circadian disruption with cancer risk. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for methodological quality assessment. Results: A total of 75 high-quality studies were included. Strong evidence supports associations between circadian disruption and breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers, with limited but emerging evidence for melanoma and bladder cancer. Mechanistic pathways involve melatonin suppression, dysregulation of CLOCK and BMAL1 genes, reduced natural killer cell activity, and chronic inflammation due to metabolic imbalance. Light-at-night (LAN) exposure and prolonged night shift work were consistently identified as major risk factors. Furthermore, economic analyses reveal a substantial burden due to increased healthcare costs and productivity losses, particularly in shift work-dominated sectors. Conclusions: Circadian misalignment is a critical, yet often overlooked, contributor to cancer incidence and associated economic burdens. Public health strategies-such as regulating shift schedules, reducing LAN exposure, and promoting chronotherapy-are essential to mitigate these risks. Further research should address sex-based differences, improve exposure measurement, and extend investigations to low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Cancer riskCircadian disruptionEconomic impactHealthcare costsMolecular mechanismsPrevention strategies

Identifiers

PMID41111921
PMCPMC12529610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.