Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111900›Full record

Observational studyGlobal heart2025

Smoking as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease in Females and Males: Observational and Mendelian Randomisation Analyses in the UK Biobank.

Sophie C de Ruiter, Lena Tschiderer, Diederick E Grobbee, Patrick Rockenschaub, Ynte M Ruigrok, Peter Willeit, Hester M den Ruijter, A Floriaan Schmidt, Sanne A E Peters

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Global heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sophie C de RuiterJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1871-1033
Lena TschidererInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7988-853X
Diederick E GrobbeeJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4472-4468
Patrick RockenschaubInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6499-7933
Ynte M RuigrokUMC Utrecht Brain Center, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5396-2989
Peter WilleitInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1866-7159
Hester M den RuijterLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9762-014X
A Floriaan SchmidtDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1327-0424
Sanne A E PetersJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0346-5412

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/22/10989European Research Council 852173UK Research and Innovation EP/Z000211/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Observational studies have shown that smoking is more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in females than in males. It remains unclear whether these observed sex differences reflect differences in the causal effects of smoking between the sexes. Methods: This study investigated sex-specific associations between ever smoking, smoking continuation, and the number of cigarettes smoked per day and CVD outcomes by conducting sex-stratified observational and Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses in the UK Biobank. Results: In observational analyses, we found a greater excess risk of ever smoking, smoking continuation, and number of cigarettes smoked per day for CVD in females than in males with female-to-male ratios of hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 1.12), 1.15 (1.07, 1.22), 1.05 (1.02, 1.08), respectively. Results were similar for CHD, and we found no sex differences for stroke. Results from MR analyses were directionally similar; however, we were not able to detect statistically significant sex differences in the effect of smoking exposures on any CVD outcome. For subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), we found indications for a stronger causal effect of ever smoking in females as compared to males (female-to-male ratio of ORs 2.61 [95%CI 1.06, 6.42]). Conclusion: This study shows that both smoking initiation and higher smoking intensity are observationally and causally related to a higher CVD risk in both females and males. Observed sex differences in the association between smoking and CVD were directionally similar to sex differences in the causal effects of smoking on CVD. In general, MR estimates were more uncertain, and the causal effects of smoking on CVD may be similar in females and males.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMendelian Randomization AnalysisSmokingAgedBiological Specimen BanksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsUK BiobankUnited Kingdomcardiovascular diseaseMendelian randomisationSex differencesSmoking

Identifiers

PMID41111900
PMCPMC12533459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.