Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111894›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Comparative Analysis of Proximate, Nutritional, and Phytochemical Profiles of Soybean Varieties Using FTIR and HPLC.

Muhammad Shoaib Fayyaz, Muhammad Farhan Jahangir Chughtai, Adnan Khaliq, Tariq Mehmood, Matteo Bordiga, Emery Lenge Mukonzo Kasongo, Tawfiq Alsulami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad Shoaib FayyazInstitute of Food Science and Technology Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology Rahim Yar Khan Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-2463
Muhammad Farhan Jahangir ChughtaiInstitute of Food Science and Technology Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology Rahim Yar Khan Pakistan.
Adnan KhaliqInstitute of Food Science and Technology Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology Rahim Yar Khan Pakistan.
Tariq MehmoodInstitute of Food Science and Technology Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology Rahim Yar Khan Pakistan.
Matteo BordigaDipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Novara Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-9843
Emery Lenge Mukonzo KasongoLand Evaluation and Agro-Metrology Research Unit, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture Research University of Lubumbashi Lubumbashi DR Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1816-5116
Tawfiq AlsulamiDepartment of Food Science & Nutrition, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean is an important legume crop having a highly nutritious profile. This study was performed to compare the phytochemical and nutritional profiles of various soybean varieties cultivated locally in Pakistan along with the quantification of isoflavone aglycones (Daidzein, Genistein, Glycitein) via HPLC and chemical composition analysis through FTIR. Three soybean varieties were selected, i.e., Ajmeri, Willium-82, and Rawal-I. The proximate composition of each soybean variety (moisture, fat, protein, and minerals), phytochemical analysis (TPC and TFC), and antioxidant analysis (FRAP and ABTS) of soybean varieties revealed significant variation (

Indexed as

antioxidant activityFTIRHPLCisoflavones quantificationPakistan soybean varietiesproximate analysis

Identifiers

PMID41111894
PMCPMC12535204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.