ArticleCureus2025
Awake Tracheal Intubation Training in a Newly Established Anaesthesia Department: An Audit of Over 200 Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airway.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAwake tracheal intubation (ATI) remains the gold standard in the management of a difficult airway. However, training in this technique is suboptimal. This has major implications for patient safety as well as anaesthetists' skill set. The report presents a quality improvement project on ATI at a newly established tertiary care hospital in India.
methodsThis project included an initial audit to identify the gaps in knowledge and skill in ATI, implementation of identified measures, followed by a re-audit to evaluate competency in ATI and patient satisfaction with airway management. Patients were followed up over the telephone at 12 weeks post-procedure to assess recall of the event. The primary outcomes included patient satisfaction with the management of difficult airway and any adverse recall of events at three-month follow-up.
resultsThe initial audit was performed in April 2024, which revealed a paucity of skill in ATI, the unavailability of flexible bronchoscopes for training, and a lack of a formal protocol. The re-audit was performed from May 2024 to April 2025. During this period, 203 ATIs were performed by 16 anaesthetists with a 100% success rate. Patient satisfaction with pre-procedure counselling and airway management was high. The complication rate was low. At the 12-week telephone review, 45% of patients recalled the event, and 9% of patients had a negative recall associated with the event.
conclusionTraining in ATI should be integrated with routine airway management to enhance expertise and confidence in the technique as well as patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.