Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111851›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Urine Gram Stain as a New Marker in Predicting Postoperative Fever in Patients Undergoing Endourological Surgeries for Stone Disease: A Prospective Study.

Vinay S Kundargi, Dhruva Hm, Siddanagouda B Patil, Santosh Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vinay S KundargiUrology, Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Dhruva HmUrology, Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Siddanagouda B PatilUrology, Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Santosh PatilUrology, Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndourological procedures, including ureterorenoscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), are the standard of care for managing urolithiasis but remain associated with postoperative fever (POF). POF is often linked to preoperative bacteriuria or infected stones and can precede urosepsis. While urine culture is the gold standard for detecting urinary tract infections, its 72-hour delay limits perioperative decision-making. Urine Gram stain (UGS) is a rapid and inexpensive diagnostic tool capable of detecting bacteriuria within minutes. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative UGS for POF in patients undergoing endourological surgeries for stone disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective study enrolled 150 adult patients undergoing URS, PCNL or RIRS for urolithiasis between January 2024 and July 2025. Patients with ongoing sepsis, recent antibiotic use within the preceding 14 days, positive preoperative urine culture, postoperative fever due to other identifiable causes, or incomplete clinical/microbiological data were excluded. Preoperative midstream urine samples were analysed for Gram stain and culture. POF was defined as a temperature ≥38 °C within 72 hours postoperatively, with follow-up extending to capture fevers occurring after discharge during this period. Statistical analysis included chi-square, t-tests, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess the predictive performance of UGS.

resultsPOF occurred in 24 patients (16.0%). Positive UGS was observed in 19/24 (79.2%) POF cases versus 21/126 (16.7%) non-POF cases (OR 11.8, 95% CI 4.1-34.2, p<0.0001). Positive urine culture was seen in 16/24 (66.7%) versus 18/126 (14.3%) (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.1-16.7, p=0.001). UGS demonstrated 79.2% sensitivity, 82.5% specificity, 47.5% positive predictive value, and 94.5% negative predictive value for predicting POF (AUC=0.83, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed positive UGS (OR 11.8, 95% CI 4.1-34.2) and positive culture (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2.1-16.7) as independent predictors of POF.

conclusionPreoperative UGS is a rapid, cost-effective, and reliable predictor of POF in endourological stone surgeries. Its integration into preoperative protocols can enhance early risk stratification, enable timely antibiotic optimisation, and potentially reduce postoperative infectious morbidity.

Indexed as

endourological surgerypercutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl)postoperative feverretrograde intrarenal surgery (rirs)stone diseaseureterorenoscopy (urs)urine gram stain

Identifiers

PMID41111851
PMCPMC12532271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.