ArticleCureus2025
Functional Outcomes of Selective Nerve Root Block in Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Intervertebral Disc Prolapse.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lumbar spinal stenosis exacerbated by spinal epidural lipomatosis: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Lumbar radiculopathy (LR) due to prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) is a prevalent cause of pain and functional limitation. Selective nerve root block (SNRB) is used both diagnostically and therapeutically; however, pragmatic effectiveness data remain limited. Objective This study aims to quantify short‑term changes in pain and disability following fluoroscopy‑guided SNRB for single‑level LR due to PIVD. Materials and methods Prospective observational cohort at a secondary‑care hospital. Adults aged 18-60 years with clinicoradiologic concordance for single‑level LR received SNRB. Outcomes were measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline, immediately post-procedure (day 0), 30 days, and 90 days. The Straight‑Leg Raise Test (SLRT) was assessed at each visit. Paired comparisons evaluated changes from baseline; 30‑ vs. 90‑day differences were also tested. Results Thirty‑five patients were included. Mean NRS decreased from 6.40 ± 0.78 at baseline to 3.29 ± 0.57 (day 0), 3.17 ± 0.64 (30 days), and 3.14 ± 0.55 (90 days); all comparisons vs. baseline p = 0.0001; 30 → 90 days p = 0.201. ODI improved from 14.31 ± 3.43 to 7.83 ± 2.26 (day 0), 7.86 ± 2.68 (30 days), and 6.86 ± 2.39 (90 days); all p = 0.0001 vs. baseline. SLRT converted from positive pre‑procedure to negative immediately and at 30 days, with partial recurrence in 4/35 (11.4%) at 90 days. Conclusions In this cohort, fluoroscopy‑guided SNRB produced rapid and durable improvements in pain and disability through three months, supporting its use as an intermediate option between initial conservative care and surgery when clinical and imaging findings are concordant. Larger randomized or comparative‑effectiveness studies with longer follow‑up are warranted to assess durability, define predictors of response, and optimize patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.