ArticleCureus2025
Neck Findings in Hanging: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Conventional Autopsy and Postmortem CT-Based Virtual Autopsy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Suicide is a significant public health concern, causing numerous deaths each year, with hanging accounting for the majority of these fatalities. In our country, such deaths require a medicolegal autopsy, even though most relatives of the deceased are often reluctant to consent. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of virtual autopsy (VA) using postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) in detecting neck findings in hanging, in comparison to conventional autopsy (CA). Materials and methods This study included 19 cases of hanging brought to a tertiary care center for medicolegal autopsy. All cases underwent VA using PMCT, followed by CA. Neck findings obtained from both autopsy modalities were subsequently compared. Results In this cross-sectional study, 19 cases of hanging were included, comprising 10 females and nine males. There was strong agreement between VA and CA in identifying the ligature material. Examination of the ligature mark showed that VA could detect its presence with 89.5% accuracy and accurately determine the knot position in 84.2% of cases. Fracture of the hyoid bone was observed in one case and was detected by both VA and CA. Conclusions VA using PMCT is effective in determining the neck findings in hanging, especially those of the skin and bony structures. Thus, it can be used as a supplement to the CA in hanging. This will help to reduce the total duration of the autopsy while respecting the sentiments of the next of kin by handing over the body of their loved one intact and without deformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.