ArticleCureus2025
Patient Impact of Surgery Abroad: A Retrospective Qualitative Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background With increasing international travel, more Northern Ireland (NI) residents are sustaining injuries abroad, sometimes requiring emergency orthopaedic surgery. Upon repatriation, the National Health Service (NHS) must address complications and ensure continuity of care. This study evaluates the experiences and outcomes of NI residents who underwent emergency orthopaedic surgery abroad. Methods A retrospective qualitative descriptive study was conducted at Ulster Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, between August 2024 and April 2025. Patients who sustained orthopaedic injuries abroad and received emergency surgery overseas were identified via Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) records. Data were collected through structured online surveys and analysed descriptively. Results Twelve patients were included (median age 62.5 years; nine female, three male). Procedures included open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (n = 8), intramedullary (IM) nail (n = 3), and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) (n = 1). Postoperative complications occurred in seven patients (58%), including infection, non-union, hardware failure, and the need for revision surgery. Communication barriers were common: two patients did not sign consent forms, and half of those in non-English-speaking countries lacked interpreter support. Four patients felt pressured into surgery abroad, and six (50%) would have preferred repatriation to NI for treatment. Discussion Overseas surgery was associated with a high complication rate, substantially exceeding that reported for similar procedures in the UK (10%-20%). Contributing factors included inadequate consent, poor communication, limited postoperative documentation, and lack of structured discharge planning. These findings indicate that emergency surgery abroad frequently compromises patient safety and increases the NHS resource burden. Conclusion Emergency orthopaedic surgery abroad carries significant risks, with complications nearly three times higher than UK benchmarks. Improvements in international communication, interpreter availability, and repatriation protocols are urgently needed. NHS policy should anticipate the rising demand for coordinated, cross-border care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.